The failure of a trademark registration main template review typically occurs due to several common reasons:
Non-compliance with formal requirements: The application form or template may lack necessary details, such as the applicant's full legal name, address, clear description of the goods/services, or proper classification under the Nice Classification system.
Example: If the applicant fails to specify whether the trademark is for "software" (Class 9) or "consulting services" (Class 35), the review may be rejected.
Unclear or non-distinctive trademark: The mark may be generic, descriptive, or lack distinctiveness, making it ineligible for protection.
Example: A trademark like "Best Coffee" for a coffee shop may be rejected because it describes the service rather than uniquely identifying the brand.
Similarity to existing trademarks: The proposed mark may resemble an already registered trademark in the same class, leading to a likelihood of confusion.
Example: Registering "AppleTech" for electronics might conflict with an existing "Apple" trademark in Class 9.
Improper use of prohibited elements: Some marks may include offensive language, national symbols, or other restricted content.
If the rejection is due to technical errors, resubmit the corrected application. For substantive issues (e.g., similarity), consider modifying the trademark or narrowing its scope.