Container escape protection solutions and container image security are closely related because both aim to secure containerized environments, but they address different stages of the container lifecycle.
Container image security focuses on ensuring that the container images used to create containers are free from vulnerabilities, malware, or malicious code. This includes scanning images for known vulnerabilities (CVEs), verifying image authenticity (e.g., using digital signatures), and enforcing policies to prevent the use of untrusted or outdated images. If a container image is compromised, it can lead to security breaches, including potential container escape attacks.
Container escape protection solutions are designed to prevent attackers from breaking out of a container's isolated environment to access the host system or other containers. These solutions involve hardening the container runtime (e.g., using secure configurations for Docker or containerd), enforcing strict namespace and seccomp profiles, and using hypervisor-based isolation (e.g., Kata Containers or gVisor).
The relationship between the two is that a compromised container image can be a vector for container escape attacks. For example, if an image contains a malicious binary that exploits a vulnerability in the container runtime, it could allow an attacker to escape the container. Therefore, securing container images is a proactive measure to reduce the risk of container escape, while escape protection solutions are reactive or defensive mechanisms to mitigate the impact of such attacks.
Example:
Tencent Cloud Recommendations: