Evaluating model fairness and bias in AI image processing involves assessing whether the model treats different demographic groups (e.g., gender, race, age, or skin tone) equitably and identifying systematic errors or preferences that disadvantage certain groups. Here’s a step-by-step approach with explanations and examples:
1. Define Fairness Metrics
Fairness can be evaluated using quantitative metrics tailored to the context:
- Demographic Parity (Statistical Parity): Measures whether the model’s outcomes (e.g., classification labels) are equally distributed across groups. For example, if a facial recognition system has a 95% accuracy for light-skinned faces but only 80% for dark-skinned faces, it fails this metric.
- Equal Opportunity: Ensures true positive rates (TPR) are similar across groups. For instance, in medical image analysis, if a disease detection model has higher TPR for male patients than female patients, it indicates bias.
- Equalized Odds: Combines equal opportunity and false positive rates (FPR), ensuring both TPR and FPR are balanced across groups.
2. Identify Sensitive Attributes
Determine which demographic or contextual attributes could lead to bias (e.g., skin tone in facial recognition, gender in pose estimation). These attributes are often annotated in datasets or inferred from metadata.
3. Dataset Analysis
- Check Data Distribution: Ensure the training data represents all groups proportionally. For example, if a facial analysis dataset has 80% light-skinned faces and 20% dark-skinned faces, the model may learn biases.
- Label Bias: Verify if annotations (e.g., "attractive" or "professional" labels) are applied inconsistently across groups.
4. Model Evaluation
- Disaggregated Performance Metrics: Compute accuracy, precision, recall, or F1-score separately for each group. For example, in an object detection task, check if small objects (often underrepresented) are detected less accurately.
- Bias Detection Tools: Use tools like IBM’s AI Fairness 360 or Google’s What-If Tool to visualize disparities.
5. Mitigation Strategies
- Re-sampling or Re-weighting: Adjust training data to balance underrepresented groups.
- Adversarial Debiasing: Train models to minimize the ability to predict sensitive attributes while maintaining task performance.
- Post-processing: Modify predictions (e.g., adjusting decision thresholds) to improve fairness.
Example in AI Image Processing
A facial recognition system trained primarily on lighter skin tones may have higher error rates for darker skin. To evaluate fairness:
- Test Accuracy by Skin Tone: Measure False Non-Match Rates (FNMR) and False Match Rates (FMR) across Fitzpatrick skin tone scales.
- Use Fairness Metrics: Check if the Equal Opportunity metric (TPR for light vs. dark skin) is balanced.
- Mitigate Bias: Augment the training dataset with more diverse skin tones or apply adversarial training to reduce reliance on skin color features.
For scalable solutions, Tencent Cloud TI-ONE (AI Platform) provides tools for dataset management, bias detection, and model optimization, helping ensure fair AI deployments. Additionally, Tencent Cloud TI-Accel accelerates responsible AI development with integrated fairness evaluation modules.