Compliance is not a vibe; it’s a set of constraints that your QQ robot must follow every day. Most teams only think about compliance after a message goes viral, an admin complains, or logs reveal something that should never have been stored.
If your QQ robot is built on OpenClaw and deployed on Tencent Cloud Lighthouse, you can treat compliance as an engineering feature: policies, permissions, logging rules, and guardrails that are consistent across all intents. Lighthouse helps because it’s simple to operate, high performance, and cost-effective for a bot that must stay online 24/7.
In practice, you need to control:
Compliance is easier when these rules are centralized in the agent layer.
With a stable runtime, you can enforce consistent policies across every QQ group.
Make admin-only commands explicit:
/export-logs/set-model/debug onDefine what “allowed” looks like:
# qq-output-policy.yaml
defaults:
max_chars: 900
forbid_topics: ["personal_data", "hate", "violence"]
intents:
faq:
max_chars: 500
report:
required_sections: ["Summary", "Next Steps"]
Store metadata, not raw content.
If you must store transcripts, apply retention and restrict access.
Compliance is easier when you can answer:
That’s why structured logs and policy IDs matter.
If you build features first, retrofitting compliance becomes painful.
With these guardrails in place, your QQ robot can scale to more groups and more features without becoming a compliance liability.